Friday 2 May 2014

The philosophers movie...what a

 
Shambles
I waited years for this movie
I guess good does not always come to those who wait
But before I wade in shallowness of putridity
Which was this let down of a movie
I will start with its finer points
One the visuals
Props and scene location
Was eye watering
Amazing
And any other synonyms
Especially living in the confines of concrete shaped landscape
Doused in gray
The view was one of such vibrancy

Moral ambiguity

Morality of life
Or sentiments
Of selected sentience
Was brought up for me in h.o.t.d
And in this iron man comic
Where he was questioned if he was an organic fascist
Are you am I
Do you or I really believe in the value if there is a value in sentience
Do moralities wrench when you swat a fly or step on an ant or kill bed bugs or kill for food
Or is it vindicated by justification
By food  pest or annoyance
And is survival that great of answer
So do we admit we would not bat an eyelid destroying a robot or killing a threat
But is ambiguity compatible with generalist morality
Or is morality a human phenomenon

So robots and non humans are excluded
Or after the initial outdated ideas they will be replaced
Or updated
So for now it is not a problem it is only a philosophic one
And the animal problem is slowly being addressed
And so ten thousand years from now their maybe some moral facets un thought of by non philosophers

Where you get to a place like in>>>

At the end of.. what happens

I am currently watching h.o.t.d
And aside from the crudeness it has been 2 eps in well written. .

And it got my philosopher mind up and running
About how it would be
How would I be

And does a situation like that actually bring people together
And if not or so why

And then it should be survival of the fittest but would it be....
Though may get suspended they would be still be there and could only really disappear in a new generation
For example helping the injured or weak
Would be something that at times cause moral problems

But if for you it did not you better act like it did because you would an easy target for the moral ambiguity to be focused on and an excellent coaxer of hypocrisy

So I can see that teacher being kkilled or left to die

Since he is not subtle with ruthlessness

A situation like the premise of the story shows the value of morality and also its real origin and function

So in closing

Does really whatever that doesn't kill us make us strong er