housing who

for most humans
their is a relationship between house and human

where most of us can not picture a severing of that relationship or the ideology

for some it is a simple matter of fact in their mind like
bees and beehives or bears and caves


and with some sections of science preaching humans were once in caves
and for some except batman
would not go back to a cave

so what happens when a human is severed from their house
they become homeless

and for some worthless but that is just a matter of opinion or is it



and we have seen this seen many times from movies to real life

and you ponder why are they homeless but you also say i never want to be homeless

and now their are many charities preying off of the homeless and some helping them
to gain money

which brought me to a special question
why do people not invite the homeless to stay with them

then it happened i was put in a position to shelter a homeless guy
and i did so

the maxim do unto others as you would have them do unto you
was prevalent in my thoughts

and as with anything there is a honeymoon period
and then the true face is shown after missed glimpses

and in a manner of speaking i became homeless

for the once safe haven
had been breached
and i had to seek for my solace elsewhere

and your routine from ending up overboard with the person you just pulled from overboard
was becoming in jeopardy


imagine the irony save someone from being homeless then join them
and then i found myself going over and beyond
the call of duty

and what you do not factor in
is that outside of their predicament
they are a person
and their persona
maybe the very reason why they are where the are
along with other factors

and then i found myself in another maxim give a man a fish and he eats for a day
teach him how to fish and he eats for a lifetime

but by my actions i was feeding not teaching

and i was to and fro whilst they were nonchalant ungrateful and grumbling

remembering what my uncle told me that he never buys food for the homeless
instead he would take them to the job centre
and that was the lesson i learnt

with me thinking i was helping i was not i was aiding

and what blinded me was the maxim of how you would like to be treated
and the fact that it was only a mirage of myself  inside this person

and that their is homeless and there is hopeless
and i could become homeless
but i forbid to become hopeless and bite the hand that feeds me

because
is homelessness a problem because humans are = to homes
or because the architecture of our cities is only geared for housing residence

whereas in nature you could wash in a river
their is no openly applicable or safe rivers


and in closing i was discussing with the homeless person about being strategic
and they replied who does this

and i was brought to reality
that that this was no victim he was a perpetrator of his situation

which runs with certain eu people coming here earning the language on the way
and not prepared or ready for their surroundings

but now i know why people do not take the homeless into their homes

Suisei no Gargantia aka ebony tower part 2

so i am currently engrossed 

in ^^^^ this anime i am only four episodes in and have been sent on a rollercoaster of ideas

it starts of with a narrative backdrop of the situation the character is in 

and we find out humanity has had to leave earth 

yep earth 

and is in the stationed in the far regions of the galaxy 

engaged against a foe which attempts to destroy them 

and thwart their progression 

obviously if their are annihilitated

and what does anyone under threat of annihilation 

do 

they set up a defence 

and so we see how defence is in the future 

it is as futuristic as it comes

which had me briefly space out to the potential 

and is this our future

of humanity 

and how advanced technology can become or will become

we see they are able to warp space 

literally create wormholes

and they fight in ships which are more like iron man armour 

if you are familiar with anime it is mecha

and so we see them in this war

and the main character is disconnected from the fleet as they are closing the worm hole 

whilst retreating

and we find out he has crash landed 

and has been asleep for six months and has non tech savvy people attempt to pry open the suit 

with their archaic tools

and he cannot understand them 

so he attempts to figure our where he is and get his suit to decipher the language

jumping forward a bit he finds out 

he is on earth it is hinted at that he has time traveled 

and he is at a stand of with the very same people that were trying to bounty his suit

and you really get into feel of the sense of alienation 

whilst waiting for suit to finish translation 

and even when it does for days their is a stand off 

even though he could wipe them out in a second

and then it is a constant relay through the machine 

though he does start to learn some of the words

but what gets to him are the customs 

 

such as eating animal carcass

and got me thinking of a time outside of the tower

but how the outlandish things of today 

are the ordinary 

readily accepted things

of tomorrow

the clash of customs and ideals is one of constant warfare along with the alienation

for what is made of soldiers in peace time

and a series of events pass

and he has a haven whilst he considers his next move 

but what happens to soldiers in peace time

but what hit me the most 

is that though their have been many programs about body swapping 

that this is itself was body swapping 

in a sense an out of body experience

seeing how the other lives and acts 

yet not apart of it 

and that we have that outside of anime and it is called travel

and this concludes part 2

scaling the side walls of scarcity

scaling the walls of scarcity

technology is heralded as the victors against scarcity
in the western world
fired with privilege
with such advancements
and a multicultural society
with religious freedom
one might think
that morality and scarcity
are unlit fossilized ashes
and that is a matter for far away shores
but scarcity is not joined at the hip with natural resources
but with anything
of a finite nature
created or otherwise
such as time
the beginning of a work day is an arrangement aloof
in the arbitrary
from the consequences to the lack of adherence
then the point of technology alleviating or alienating
scarcity
it is possible but is it probable is the question
as with tube space allocation and the number of carriages
that descend those of proposed morality on the opposing sides
of fairness and equality
huddling help and turning the other cheek out of mind
as morality now is a liability
a luxury not afforded
where one pokes under the proposed
canopy of civility
where civilians rather
risk carriage collisions
inner cranium contusions
than forgo their afforded privileges
or to slip in front of another deviously
yet huff and puff when someone reciprocates
their deed
do unto others as you have them do unto you
the same preachers of collectivism
wearing emblems of national flags upon clothing
ironically endorsing and promoting a structure
then clamber over with ease over one of its inhabitants
to further individualistic gains
for this space
a space compact
in between a multitude
you hustle and bustled with
or passed
to the point of not letting passengers off the train
of such a regular occurrence
tfl actually have employees to advise travelers to let others
disembark from the carriage
before any attempt to embark
creating this perpetuated karma
uninhibited by audible advice
the sword of scarcity cutting off the ties to morality
ushering its subjects to the callous
but as i find myself being ushered closer and closer
to the yellow safety line
become territorial for my spot
and angling my body
i remark at how scarcity has no power
and it is our weakness that fuels it
it is not a tower
some impregnable fortress of infallible fortitude
but a ditch of our own digging devices
and i begin to see others greedily pass me to be pressed up
against the glass

for the next carriage to have more than enough room
and that scarcity has the power we give it
for time is our construction not our task master
and that we should be the change we want to see

so thanks again for reading i have been very active so the post have been thick and fast
so keep your eye for the next one within the next


yes


four days

easy money what about an easy summary

This is just one of the latest ads being posted around london
by the metropolitan police

but as i walked away from this ad it started to trouble me
that i know straight away this a poor analysis actually it is not even an analysis
but a dimwitted view

but is this the view of these law enforces the actually deductive reasoning that goes on under their chequered hats

you can see the advert is broken into parts you start with the colour coded description
separating a whole set of words visually from another

then you have the pictorial arrow signalling what the person is doing

and then then there is the telling of the story

first is the reasoning in the persons head so simplistic
so criminals are simplistic who do this or this particular criminal in inverted commas is
it is not made clear

so then the person is talking to whom we don't know
unless it is someone speaking through the persona of a criminal
that they proceed to then to show you where and what they are gonna do

But it is not the buffoonery simplistic slap stick failed stance of either being analysis or different perspective that really got me
or that the very people who deal with these people day in and day out
would back this ad
which begs the question are they all force no mental function

but that they summed down a person and their thoughts into a cardboard caricature of what a person or people and environments really are

 In the all out attempt to demonise someone and make it a thieves vs victims scenario it brings more questions than it professedly was meant to address

like why is it easy money
why do they think of it as easy money
is the stolen phone market a profitable one
Since it is an ad meant for the victim why do they spend more time on a looney toon type of
scenario on the thieves side than the victims
So what is the lesson you are meant to get from this
a poor look into the psyche of the person deemed thief

But expanding on some questions i have stated and perhaps i have not
what is the idea behind easy money
are we saying easy money is wrong or just this case
or that a conceptual idea is in society about easy money and some will and some will not act on it
for example the lottery or gambling
and how do people look at people who are avid supporters of gambling or the lottery
compared to the institutions of supposed easy money such as casinos and betting shops
especially in my area of forest gate the insane rise of betting shops for some has been alarming
walking on woodgrange road before you get to the station you past 5
when going back ten years there was one

Also the adage of easy changes the statement
from easy money will promote thoughts
of get a job and ideas of class types
but if you said they see money
you would sympathise to an extent not just villanise

Also why do these people see it as money there must be institutions in place
who profit of these people trading in phones for money
but i guess these people pay tax on that money and thieves in inverted commas
do not
Seeing this mockery of an insight into this persons head you see no evidence of ill will
from the person towards the victim
but a sense of ill will is attempted to be produced from the advert

as i said before about the adage
if people were stealing for just money
it begs the question
why do they not have money
are people not hiring them are jobs not being afforded to them
are they part of the disenfranchised
are their lower rungs of society we do not see or want to see
but the word easy changes the mental image you will concoct of the person
that they are lazy villainous if it were a movie he has a goatee or a weird accent and an evil name

I previously talked about classes and where we stand in regards to others
it seems adverts by law enforcement would have us stand on opposing sides then try to demolish a fence between people

as i said it is a caricature of a person because it tries to water down the need to making it a want
so if we are dealing with humans not proposed stereotypes
do you enter into this scenario and go oh easy money
describe to yourself what you are going to do
then start doing it
for just a bit of pocket change
if you were going to go down that route was because you needed money
and its funny how the story does not start from the beginning
and does not finish but is just a cut out section

for with this easy money supposedly where do they go from there
what type of residency do they go to that night
how much money do they have in their pocket

Simple things are rarely simple and we should look twice when something seems too simple

maybe we can go away and think or pick out something
that is positioned to us as simple
and see if it is still after scrutiny

this is rebel reasoner thanks again for reading these posts
you can find me rebel reasoner on twitter
 my next post will be within the next four days
and perhaps give me a shout out on
any comments questions or the new layout