Escaping our childhood

Can we escape our childhoods
Are we just the spectrums of our childhoods
And if so can we escape it

If a people are people because of their culture and customs
Can people who do not tie into the traditional system be then not catergorically of the people

Just observing people
I am deducing
Not many variants from the conclusion of the guessed potentialities

And the leanings towards degrees of people
That many claim uniqueness
Others of a different degree would laugh at it
For all claims of uniqueness
Their couldnt be social norms
Or the ridiculous generalisation towards human nature
Adverts would be a harder business than currently
Or am I equating uniqueness to unpredictability
So perhaps uniqueness can be put into spheres of degrees
But can barely differential difference really be catalogued
Since uniqueness is meant to be distinct
For does doing a unique thing make you unique
I would surmise not
But we have diverted
For do we escape childhoods
This the time
We learn
Life skills
Etched upon us in our most impressionable time
For I am current watching a tv program called psych
About a guy with incredible powers of observation
and the regular people surmise as in an episode
Of sherlock that the person deducing could not achieve the outcome without being involved in the crime
Psych he pretends to be a psychic but an over the top one to exhibit or hide the truth
Wish brings up why being a psychic is easier for people to grasp than high functioning observational skills

Perhaps psychic allows the ordinary to not look at them selves as a matter
Of it being a talent or a skill endowed
Well as observational skills are one where anyone could of came to the answer if they looked
And ygat reflects on the person directly but not everyone wants to look at themselves

And psych we see is a person
Who his dad trained him in honing his skills
To the point it can be seen as harshness
Such as you walk in a room
And recalling what was seen as such as how many hats are in a room

And I think it was also one of the foundation bricks of magic
But psych switches between his old and young self
And why he has certain gifts and skills

For if you are wearing an orange shirt in a crowd of red shirts you can surmise that person is unique but when you see someone with a yellow shirt orange absorbs into red
And if you put a green hoodie
The yellow gets absorbed
And then you have someone topless you can get another parameter

But I have seen people who have come from simplistic background become complex
And complex backgrounds become simplistic
But there are more factors at play
But it comes to the argument nature vs nurture

For being an individual does not mean you are an individual
For batteries come in individual portions but are indistinguishable from each other and form the same function
Whereas batteries are different from pens but are not really different from their contemporaries

Conclusion we can escape but to what degree

scaling the side walls of scarcity

scaling the walls of scarcity

technology is heralded as the victors against scarcity
in the western world
fired with privilege
with such advancements
and a multicultural society
with religious freedom
one might think
that morality and scarcity
are unlit fossilized ashes
and that is a matter for far away shores
but scarcity is not joined at the hip with natural resources
but with anything
of a finite nature
created or otherwise
such as time
the beginning of a work day is an arrangement aloof
in the arbitrary
from the consequences to the lack of adherence
then the point of technology alleviating or alienating
scarcity
it is possible but is it probable is the question
as with tube space allocation and the number of carriages
that descend those of proposed morality on the opposing sides
of fairness and equality
huddling help and turning the other cheek out of mind
as morality now is a liability
a luxury not afforded
where one pokes under the proposed
canopy of civility
where civilians rather
risk carriage collisions
inner cranium contusions
than forgo their afforded privileges
or to slip in front of another deviously
yet huff and puff when someone reciprocates
their deed
do unto others as you have them do unto you
the same preachers of collectivism
wearing emblems of national flags upon clothing
ironically endorsing and promoting a structure
then clamber over with ease over one of its inhabitants
to further individualistic gains
for this space
a space compact
in between a multitude
you hustle and bustled with
or passed
to the point of not letting passengers off the train
of such a regular occurrence
tfl actually have employees to advise travelers to let others
disembark from the carriage
before any attempt to embark
creating this perpetuated karma
uninhibited by audible advice
the sword of scarcity cutting off the ties to morality
ushering its subjects to the callous
but as i find myself being ushered closer and closer
to the yellow safety line
become territorial for my spot
and angling my body
i remark at how scarcity has no power
and it is our weakness that fuels it
it is not a tower
some impregnable fortress of infallible fortitude
but a ditch of our own digging devices
and i begin to see others greedily pass me to be pressed up
against the glass

for the next carriage to have more than enough room
and that scarcity has the power we give it
for time is our construction not our task master
and that we should be the change we want to see

so thanks again for reading i have been very active so the post have been thick and fast
so keep your eye for the next one within the next


yes


four days

easy money what about an easy summary

This is just one of the latest ads being posted around london
by the metropolitan police

but as i walked away from this ad it started to trouble me
that i know straight away this a poor analysis actually it is not even an analysis
but a dimwitted view

but is this the view of these law enforces the actually deductive reasoning that goes on under their chequered hats

you can see the advert is broken into parts you start with the colour coded description
separating a whole set of words visually from another

then you have the pictorial arrow signalling what the person is doing

and then then there is the telling of the story

first is the reasoning in the persons head so simplistic
so criminals are simplistic who do this or this particular criminal in inverted commas is
it is not made clear

so then the person is talking to whom we don't know
unless it is someone speaking through the persona of a criminal
that they proceed to then to show you where and what they are gonna do

But it is not the buffoonery simplistic slap stick failed stance of either being analysis or different perspective that really got me
or that the very people who deal with these people day in and day out
would back this ad
which begs the question are they all force no mental function

but that they summed down a person and their thoughts into a cardboard caricature of what a person or people and environments really are

 In the all out attempt to demonise someone and make it a thieves vs victims scenario it brings more questions than it professedly was meant to address

like why is it easy money
why do they think of it as easy money
is the stolen phone market a profitable one
Since it is an ad meant for the victim why do they spend more time on a looney toon type of
scenario on the thieves side than the victims
So what is the lesson you are meant to get from this
a poor look into the psyche of the person deemed thief

But expanding on some questions i have stated and perhaps i have not
what is the idea behind easy money
are we saying easy money is wrong or just this case
or that a conceptual idea is in society about easy money and some will and some will not act on it
for example the lottery or gambling
and how do people look at people who are avid supporters of gambling or the lottery
compared to the institutions of supposed easy money such as casinos and betting shops
especially in my area of forest gate the insane rise of betting shops for some has been alarming
walking on woodgrange road before you get to the station you past 5
when going back ten years there was one

Also the adage of easy changes the statement
from easy money will promote thoughts
of get a job and ideas of class types
but if you said they see money
you would sympathise to an extent not just villanise

Also why do these people see it as money there must be institutions in place
who profit of these people trading in phones for money
but i guess these people pay tax on that money and thieves in inverted commas
do not
Seeing this mockery of an insight into this persons head you see no evidence of ill will
from the person towards the victim
but a sense of ill will is attempted to be produced from the advert

as i said before about the adage
if people were stealing for just money
it begs the question
why do they not have money
are people not hiring them are jobs not being afforded to them
are they part of the disenfranchised
are their lower rungs of society we do not see or want to see
but the word easy changes the mental image you will concoct of the person
that they are lazy villainous if it were a movie he has a goatee or a weird accent and an evil name

I previously talked about classes and where we stand in regards to others
it seems adverts by law enforcement would have us stand on opposing sides then try to demolish a fence between people

as i said it is a caricature of a person because it tries to water down the need to making it a want
so if we are dealing with humans not proposed stereotypes
do you enter into this scenario and go oh easy money
describe to yourself what you are going to do
then start doing it
for just a bit of pocket change
if you were going to go down that route was because you needed money
and its funny how the story does not start from the beginning
and does not finish but is just a cut out section

for with this easy money supposedly where do they go from there
what type of residency do they go to that night
how much money do they have in their pocket

Simple things are rarely simple and we should look twice when something seems too simple

maybe we can go away and think or pick out something
that is positioned to us as simple
and see if it is still after scrutiny

this is rebel reasoner thanks again for reading these posts
you can find me rebel reasoner on twitter
 my next post will be within the next four days
and perhaps give me a shout out on
any comments questions or the new layout